deploy-scenario.sh now single-sources the application backend: it copies the git-tracked files under [scenario].backend into the workspace root (where .pi/ sits beside them), preserving modes and skipping caches/venvs. It overwrites but never prunes, and never restarts -- it prints a restart reminder when backend files change. README's Application code section updated to match.
8.1 KiB
pi-agent-config
Authoritative configuration for every Pi agent on this host: the user-level Pi runtime, plus one directory per dedicated agent scenario.
The live locations (~/.pi/agent, ~/pi-workspaces/*) are runtime copies.
Changes are made here and pushed out with scripts/deploy-*.sh, never the other
way round — except for scenarios explicitly marked deploy = "mirror", which
record what a running service already does.
Verified against pi 0.84.3. Re-run the probes after every pi update.
Gitea repository and push authentication
Everything here — the runtime config, every scenario's agent config, and (for
scenarios that run a service) the application backend — lives in a single Gitea
repository: kai/pi-agent-config on the server at 192.168.50.45 (web UI on
:3000, SSH on :222). There is no per-agent repository; a Pi agent is a
directory under scenarios/, not a separate repo.
Push and pull over SSH key auth only (no HTTP token). The Git user is git,
not kai. ~/.ssh/config:
Host gitea-45
HostName 192.168.50.45
User git
Port 222
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_gitea
IdentitiesOnly yes
The remote is origin -> gitea-45:kai/pi-agent-config.git (branch main). Run
Git from the repository root, never from a scenario subdirectory that might carry
a different remote:
git pull --rebase origin main
git push origin main
Verify access:
ssh -T gitea-45 # "Hi there, kai! ... authenticated"
git ls-remote gitea-45:kai/pi-agent-config.git
- The key file must be
0600; never read or print its contents. gitea-pve, if present in your SSH config, is a host login — not a Git remote.- The
verify-no-secrets.shpre-commit hook must pass; never use--no-verify.
Scenarios
| Scenario | Purpose | Service | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
curator |
Book / film / TV / music curation agent | curator.service |
deployed; agent config and application backend both tracked here |
memo-inbox |
Routes Telegram/WeChat messages to Calendar, Obsidian todo or journal | pi-memo-telegram.service |
mirror of live config, zero behaviour change |
pi-grok |
Interactive Grok 4.6 coding agent | none (manual) | registered only |
Application code
A scenario that runs its own service keeps that service's source under
scenarios/<name>/backend/ — for curator, the Python package, tests, systemd
units and config templates. It is the single source of truth; the live checkout
at the scenario's workspace path is a runtime copy.
deploy-scenario.sh installs workspace/ (the .pi config), vendors shared
extensions, renders the launch contract, and syncs backend/ into the workspace
root — copying only git-tracked files (build caches and virtualenvs never leak)
and preserving file modes. It never prunes files the repo no longer tracks, never
builds a venv, and never restarts the service: it prints a reminder instead, since
restarting decides when to interrupt a live conversation.
Start here
| Document | Contents |
|---|---|
docs/pi-runtime-notes.md |
pi 0.84.3 mechanics that the official docs understate, each verified against source or a live probe |
docs/isolation-baseline.md |
The four isolation layers and the flag set every scenario should use |
docs/personality-layering.md |
How to choose between SYSTEM.md, APPEND_SYSTEM.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md and the request |
docs/gateway-patterns.md |
Ten patterns for hosting an agent behind a long-running service |
docs/plans/ |
Active work plans |
The finding that motivated this repository
pi emits the <available_skills> block only when a tool named read is
active (dist/core/system-prompt.js:59,113). The Curator service ran with
--no-tools --skill … for its entire lifetime, so:
- its 64-line media policy never reached the model,
--skillwas a no-op,- and both the README and the deployment runbook described a mechanism that was not happening.
Measured on the real workspace, before and after (evidence):
| before | after | |
|---|---|---|
| system prompt | 2548 chars | 3539 chars |
expert coding assistant framing |
present | gone |
| pointer to pi's own documentation | present | gone |
| the 64-line media policy | absent | present |
<available_skills> |
absent | absent |
workspace AGENTS.md |
loaded | blocked |
parent-directory AGENTS.md |
leaked | blocked |
The prompt got larger, and that is the fix rather than its cost: of the original 2548 characters roughly 1.9 KB was pi's coding-assistant scaffolding and a pointer telling the agent to read pi's documentation and follow its cross-references — noise for a media agent, and a ready-made escalation path for injected text — while none of it was Curator's own policy. All 3539 characters now are.
A mechanism demonstration with a stub SYSTEM.md is in
docs/evidence/2026-08-27-isolation-probe.md;
its 960-character figure measures the stub, not Curator.
Reproduce either with docs/evidence/probe-harness/
— zero model tokens, because a single RPC get_state starts the agent, fires
session_start and exits without contacting the provider.
Layout
docs/ mechanics, baselines, plans, reproducible evidence
runtime/agent/ ~/.pi/agent — settings, models.json.template, extensions, prompts
shared/ cross-scenario code
lib/py/pi_rpc.py long-lived RPC client with rotation and budgets
extensions/pi-guard-base.ts path containment, restricted read, capability guard
scenarios/<name>/
profile.toml single source of truth for the launch contract
workspace/ what gets installed into the live workspace
eval/ recorded golden transcripts
backend/ application/service code, when the scenario runs its own service
scripts/ diff, deploy, backup, restore, secret guard
secrets/ host-local, untracked
Usage
# What differs between this repository and the host?
scripts/pi-diff.sh
scripts/pi-diff.sh curator
# Push configuration out (dry run first; neither restarts a service)
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh --apply
scripts/deploy-scenario.sh curator --apply
# Back up the live installation (archives land outside this repository)
scripts/pi-backup.sh
scripts/pi-restore.sh --from <backup dir>
# Verify the mechanics still hold after a pi upgrade
docs/evidence/probe-harness/collect-evidence.sh
shared/extensions/tests/run-guard-checks.sh
python3 shared/lib/py/tests/test_pi_rpc_smoke.py
Secrets
Nothing real ever enters this repository. models.json, auth.json,
trust.json and every *.env are ignored; secrets/ accepts only .gitkeep,
README.md, *.example and *.template.
scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh enforces this as a pre-commit hook.
Because a scenario's backend/ now holds real source, the credential-assignment
heuristic requires the value to carry entropy (a digit or uppercase letter):
snake_case identifiers such as token=extraction_token are source, not secrets,
while base64/hex/random keys still trip it.
Install it in a fresh clone:
ln -sf ../../scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh .git/hooks/pre-commit
scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh --all
Backups contain plaintext credentials and are written outside the work tree;
pi-backup.sh refuses any destination that resolves inside it.
First-time setup on a new host
git clone gitea-45:kai/pi-agent-config.git && cd pi-agent-config
ln -sf ../../scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh .git/hooks/pre-commit
cp secrets/zenmux.env.example secrets/zenmux.env
chmod 600 secrets/zenmux.env && $EDITOR secrets/zenmux.env
npm install -g @earendil-works/pi-coding-agent@0.84.3
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh --apply
scripts/deploy-scenario.sh <scenario> --apply