Deep Research Native Workflow

Description: Run a biomedical Deep Research project in Antigravity using Antigravity model quota, with explicit anti-hallucination gates and source receipts.

Step 0: Load Context

Load AGENTS.md.
Load .agents/agents.md.
Load .agents/rules/deep-research-antigravity.md.
Load .agents/skills/antigravity-surface-adapter/SKILL.md.
Load skills: mckinsey-method, search-strategy, source-quality, evidence-table, citation-manager, length-budget, output-hygiene.
Confirm topic, slug, report type, target audience, method, output length, and allowed search tools.

Gate: do not proceed if the topic, slug, and report purpose are unclear.

Step 1: Phase 0-1 With Opus

Ask the user to switch the conversation model to Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking).
Create project folders under projects/<slug>/.
Read user materials and write phase1/material_brief.md.
Run real searches and log them in phase1/search_log.md.
Write phase1/framework.md, phase1/research_brief.md, and phase1/research_brief.json.
Write phase1/unsupported_claims.md for hypotheses not yet evidenced.

Gate: pause for user confirmation. Do not enter Phase 2 before approval.

Step 2: Phase 2 With Gemini 3.1 Pro Low

Ask the user to switch the conversation model to Gemini 3.1 Pro (Low).
Build phase2/task_cards.json.
For each task card, run real searches and append phase2/search_log.jsonl.
Write phase2/packets/*.json; every packet must contain search_receipts, sources, counter_evidence, and unsupported_claims.
Build phase2/chapter_briefs/*.json and phase2/compressed_findings/*.json.
Write phase2/drafts/chXX.md only from chapter briefs and compressed findings.

Gate: do not draft a chapter from memory or snippets. Every concrete claim needs a source ID.

Step 3: Phase 3 With Gemini 3.1 Pro High

Ask the user to switch the conversation model to Gemini 3.1 Pro (High).
Review framework, packets, sources, chapter briefs, and drafts.
Write phase3/critique.md.
Include a source-audit table for at least 10 core facts.
Mark decision as go, rework, or fail.

Gate: pause for user decision after critique.

Step 4: Phase 4 With Opus

Ask the user to switch the conversation model to Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking).
Write phase4/final_zh.md from approved drafts and sources only.
Write phase4/editorial_notes.md.
Write phase4/final_fact_check.md, listing any unresolved or downgraded claims.
Use deterministic renderer tools afterward for PDF/DOCX.

Gate: final output cannot introduce new facts without adding sources and search logs first.

2.6 KiB Raw Blame History