Kai 1415037e6a fix(scripts): pi-diff was silent about vendored shared modules
.pi/extensions/_shared/ is installed by deploy-scenario.sh from shared/extensions/
and is not in the scenario's workspace/, so pi-diff listed it as merely
"UNTRACKED in live workspace" -- no comparison at all. The file most likely to
drift, because it is the one shared between scenarios, was the one the diff had
nothing to say about.

Now compared against shared/extensions/ and reported like any other file, with a
missing source called out separately.

Also fixes the counter: the new branch incremented a variable named `changed`
while the summary reads `DIFFS`, so a detected difference printed a diff and then
claimed the installation agreed, and exited 0. Verified by planting drift: exit 1
and "1 difference(s) found", then 0 after redeploying.
2026-08-28 01:12:17 -07:00

pi-agent-config

Authoritative configuration for every Pi agent on this host: the user-level Pi runtime, plus one directory per dedicated agent scenario.

The live locations (~/.pi/agent, ~/pi-workspaces/*) are runtime copies. Changes are made here and pushed out with scripts/deploy-*.sh, never the other way round — except for scenarios explicitly marked deploy = "mirror", which record what a running service already does.

Verified against pi 0.84.3. Re-run the probes after every pi update.

Scenarios

Scenario Purpose Service Status
curator Book / film / TV / music curation agent curator.service target config written, not yet deployed
memo-inbox Routes Telegram/WeChat messages to Calendar, Obsidian todo or journal pi-memo-telegram.service mirror of live config, zero behaviour change
pi-grok Interactive Grok 4.6 coding agent none (manual) registered only

Start here

Document Contents
docs/pi-runtime-notes.md pi 0.84.3 mechanics that the official docs understate, each verified against source or a live probe
docs/isolation-baseline.md The four isolation layers and the flag set every scenario should use
docs/personality-layering.md How to choose between SYSTEM.md, APPEND_SYSTEM.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md and the request
docs/gateway-patterns.md Ten patterns for hosting an agent behind a long-running service
docs/plans/ Active work plans

The finding that motivated this repository

pi emits the <available_skills> block only when a tool named read is active (dist/core/system-prompt.js:59,113). The Curator service ran with --no-tools --skill … for its entire lifetime, so:

  • its 64-line media policy never reached the model,
  • --skill was a no-op,
  • and both the README and the deployment runbook described a mechanism that was not happening.

Measured on the real workspace, before and after (evidence):

before after
system prompt 2548 chars 3539 chars
expert coding assistant framing present gone
pointer to pi's own documentation present gone
the 64-line media policy absent present
<available_skills> absent absent
workspace AGENTS.md loaded blocked
parent-directory AGENTS.md leaked blocked

The prompt got larger, and that is the fix rather than its cost: of the original 2548 characters roughly 1.9 KB was pi's coding-assistant scaffolding and a pointer telling the agent to read pi's documentation and follow its cross-references — noise for a media agent, and a ready-made escalation path for injected text — while none of it was Curator's own policy. All 3539 characters now are.

A mechanism demonstration with a stub SYSTEM.md is in docs/evidence/2026-08-27-isolation-probe.md; its 960-character figure measures the stub, not Curator.

Reproduce either with docs/evidence/probe-harness/ — zero model tokens, because a single RPC get_state starts the agent, fires session_start and exits without contacting the provider.

Layout

docs/            mechanics, baselines, plans, reproducible evidence
runtime/agent/   ~/.pi/agent — settings, models.json.template, extensions, prompts
shared/          cross-scenario code
  lib/py/pi_rpc.py            long-lived RPC client with rotation and budgets
  extensions/pi-guard-base.ts path containment, restricted read, capability guard
scenarios/<name>/
  profile.toml   single source of truth for the launch contract
  workspace/     what gets installed into the live workspace
  eval/          recorded golden transcripts
scripts/         diff, deploy, backup, restore, secret guard
secrets/         host-local, untracked

Usage

# What differs between this repository and the host?
scripts/pi-diff.sh
scripts/pi-diff.sh curator

# Push configuration out (dry run first; neither restarts a service)
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh --apply
scripts/deploy-scenario.sh curator --apply

# Back up the live installation (archives land outside this repository)
scripts/pi-backup.sh
scripts/pi-restore.sh --from <backup dir>

# Verify the mechanics still hold after a pi upgrade
docs/evidence/probe-harness/collect-evidence.sh
shared/extensions/tests/run-guard-checks.sh
python3 shared/lib/py/tests/test_pi_rpc_smoke.py

Secrets

Nothing real ever enters this repository. models.json, auth.json, trust.json and every *.env are ignored; secrets/ accepts only .gitkeep, README.md, *.example and *.template.

scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh enforces this as a pre-commit hook. Install it in a fresh clone:

ln -sf ../../scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh .git/hooks/pre-commit
scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh --all

Backups contain plaintext credentials and are written outside the work tree; pi-backup.sh refuses any destination that resolves inside it.

First-time setup on a new host

git clone gitea-45:kai/pi-agent-config.git && cd pi-agent-config
ln -sf ../../scripts/verify-no-secrets.sh .git/hooks/pre-commit

cp secrets/zenmux.env.example secrets/zenmux.env
chmod 600 secrets/zenmux.env && $EDITOR secrets/zenmux.env

npm install -g @earendil-works/pi-coding-agent@0.84.3
scripts/deploy-runtime.sh --apply
scripts/deploy-scenario.sh <scenario> --apply
S
Description
定制不同用途的 Pi Agent
Readme
551 KiB
Languages
Python 86.4%
TypeScript 7.8%
Shell 5.8%